I've always been a fan of using either songs or movie clips so show language in context. If you can use clips that relate to your learners' own lives (e.g. movies or songs suggested by them) then it adds even further interest and motivation to the learning of language/grammar.
However, one of the big obstacles with using songs is of course the difficulty in actually 'hearing' the lyrics. We've all heard those songs in which we mishear lyrics - Hendrix: "Kiss this guy"...
Therefore, lyric videos are a great way to overcome this as they display lyrics within the video. If you search Youtube for "official Lyric Video" you can find some amazingly produced example of lyric videos.
Anyhow, here are some great examples I've found and the grammar/language they could be used to highlight:
The Summer Set, Boomerang - Second Conditionals
Tegan & Sara, I was a Fool - Simple past
P!nk, Just Give me a Reason - Present Perfect / Present Perfect Progressive
Taylor Swift, We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together - Past tenses, Present Progressive
I've used such videos to do the following:
Focus on Changing Tenses - for example, in the song "We Never Ever Getting Back Together", have students focus on why the tenses change (i.e. showing how past actions can affect present states)
How many? - Have students spot incidences of target language (i.e. how many times are 2nd Conditionals used in "Boomerang"?)
Larry Ferlazzo's great blog also had a post on Lyric Videos
Saturday, September 28, 2013
Friday, May 6, 2011
Vocabulary Learning With Reading Materials
In the course I teach in, learners are required to read a number of graded readers each term. There has been extensive research into vocabulary acquisition via reading. Whilst the proponents of acquisition via extensive reading (Krashen) and the proponents of intensive vocabulary learning might be at loggerheads, not many people can argue with the fact that motivated learners who take ownership of their learning will be in a better position to actually acquire new language.
It was with this in mind that I started to think about the processes my students go through in trying to acquire new language from graded readers.
The first step was to notice the new language. With this in mind I asked my learners to highlight or circle any words in the reader which they were unfamiliar with.

The learners recorded these words on a vocabulary bookmark (which they made and decorated themselves).

At the end of each week, as a class we went through our vocabulary bookmarks and identified a group of words (5-10) that we were not sure about. The learners recorded these words on vocabulary cards and over the weekend found out the Chinese translations of the words using their dictionaries.

While the learners were finding their vocabulary translations, I made up a set of cards that contained the target words, a Chinese translation, and an example sentence.

When the learners came back to school with their translations done, they had hopefully gained a better understanding of the words (through the act of defining). Each learner was assigned one of the above cards and asked to write two sentences of their own on the backs of their cards, using a cloze format.

Once this was done, the learners used their self-made cloze sentences to ‘test’ one another’s understanding of the vocabulary. This was done in a fun game-like way and the student with the highest score was awarded a prize at the end of the week.
The whole process took about two weeks yet only required a minimal amount of extra class time. The benefits for this format were that the learners essentially selected their own target vocabulary. In addition, they got repeated and time-spaced exposures to the target vocabulary over a period of time. Such repeated, spaced exposures make retention more likely.
The first time this was done, all students worked from the same graded reader. This had the benefit of learners focusing on the same contexts for vocabulary and thus aided the procedure familiarization process. Subsequently, learners were able to engage in the same process but with their own individual graded readers.
I can highly recommend any procedures that we, as teachers, use to involve our learners in the vocabulary learning process. Have you had any success?
It was with this in mind that I started to think about the processes my students go through in trying to acquire new language from graded readers.
The first step was to notice the new language. With this in mind I asked my learners to highlight or circle any words in the reader which they were unfamiliar with.

The learners recorded these words on a vocabulary bookmark (which they made and decorated themselves).

At the end of each week, as a class we went through our vocabulary bookmarks and identified a group of words (5-10) that we were not sure about. The learners recorded these words on vocabulary cards and over the weekend found out the Chinese translations of the words using their dictionaries.
While the learners were finding their vocabulary translations, I made up a set of cards that contained the target words, a Chinese translation, and an example sentence.

When the learners came back to school with their translations done, they had hopefully gained a better understanding of the words (through the act of defining). Each learner was assigned one of the above cards and asked to write two sentences of their own on the backs of their cards, using a cloze format.

Once this was done, the learners used their self-made cloze sentences to ‘test’ one another’s understanding of the vocabulary. This was done in a fun game-like way and the student with the highest score was awarded a prize at the end of the week.
The whole process took about two weeks yet only required a minimal amount of extra class time. The benefits for this format were that the learners essentially selected their own target vocabulary. In addition, they got repeated and time-spaced exposures to the target vocabulary over a period of time. Such repeated, spaced exposures make retention more likely.
The first time this was done, all students worked from the same graded reader. This had the benefit of learners focusing on the same contexts for vocabulary and thus aided the procedure familiarization process. Subsequently, learners were able to engage in the same process but with their own individual graded readers.
I can highly recommend any procedures that we, as teachers, use to involve our learners in the vocabulary learning process. Have you had any success?
Sunday, April 24, 2011
Drama! Drama! Drama!
For 3 years now I’ve been teaching drama in an ELT program in Taiwan. Each year my grade 7 learners put on a drama show. Each homeroom class puts on a separate short play. During this time I’ve made a few observations in terms of how drama can aid English language learning as well as promoting learner confidence and learner autonomy.
Drama holds great power for helping learners improve their fluency, intonation and speech rhythm. In terms of fluency, they will practice saying many of the same things multiple times – the key here is getting them to say those things in a fluent and natural-sounding manner. This is where drama teachers can be extremely helpful in providing models of natural speech intonation and rhythm. However, this can only work if the text one is working with is well within the learner’s ability level. If there are too many unknown words then they will not be able to focus on producing fluent speech. Similarly, if the text consists of long chunks of text, low level learners will have great difficulty in saying their lines in a fluent fashion. To this end, teachers have a significant role to play in text selection. Most commercially available texts will be inappropriate (long chunks, unknown words) for English language learners. Therefore, teachers will either have to modify texts or write their own.
Putting on a play can require a lot of work. In-class role-plays are simply done, but if you’re planning to put on a show then there is a wide variety of jobs that must be completed. From choosing music, designing costumes, making props, choreographing dances, as well as positioning actors on stage, there is a wide variety of jobs which students can take responsibility for. By successfully completing such tasks, students can raise their self-confidence, build teamwork through working towards a common goal with others, and introduce their own ideas and creativity to the classroom. Such actions allow students to really take ownership of the task (putting on a play).
The fact that my learners perform many of these functions in English leads them to raised confidence and self-awareness of their English abilities. It also gives learners a reason for using English other than the normal classroom tasks.
Wednesday, November 17, 2010
Graded Readers – Guided Journal Writing
Well it has been a while… MA and new baby have been keeping me busy…
At the start of September I was faced with another semester of teaching a graded reader with my grade 9 class. It was going to be the same old process of highlighting vocabulary, discussing themes, and answering comprehension questions. The students traditionally had exam questions that focused on exploring the themes of the text.
However, I had become frustrated with the lack of thought put into these explorations on the part of the students. In addition, the students were relying on me to tell them what I wanted to write (a situation which I probably promoted). The students also felt the text examination process was a little bit boring.
What I really wanted was to take a somewhat boring activity (novel study) and turn it into a thought-provoking discussion of the text.
Of course, English learners would require more time to formulate their ideas and responses to the text.
At this point I cam across a very interesting article:
Effects of Guided Journal Writing on Students’ Story Understanding. Wong et al 2002. The Journal of Educational Research.
(A big thank you to John Macalister, Victoria University, New Zealand, for making this assigned reading in my MA program).
Instead of the traditional study method, students were provided with a reading journal. In the front of this reading journal we posted a set of guided response questions:
1. How do you feel?
2. What do you notice?
3. What do you question?
4. How do you relate to the story?
After reading each short story/chapter, students were asked to complete their journal by answering these questions along with any other observations or comments. To assist the students (as well as to promote buy-in to the task) I also kept my own journal which was available to the students.
Here is an example of a student’s response:

All in all, I have found the use of guided journals to be both a rewarding and educational experience for my students. If anyone would like further information on this or the paper, please contact me.
At the start of September I was faced with another semester of teaching a graded reader with my grade 9 class. It was going to be the same old process of highlighting vocabulary, discussing themes, and answering comprehension questions. The students traditionally had exam questions that focused on exploring the themes of the text.
However, I had become frustrated with the lack of thought put into these explorations on the part of the students. In addition, the students were relying on me to tell them what I wanted to write (a situation which I probably promoted). The students also felt the text examination process was a little bit boring.
What I really wanted was to take a somewhat boring activity (novel study) and turn it into a thought-provoking discussion of the text.
Of course, English learners would require more time to formulate their ideas and responses to the text.
At this point I cam across a very interesting article:
Effects of Guided Journal Writing on Students’ Story Understanding. Wong et al 2002. The Journal of Educational Research.
(A big thank you to John Macalister, Victoria University, New Zealand, for making this assigned reading in my MA program).
Instead of the traditional study method, students were provided with a reading journal. In the front of this reading journal we posted a set of guided response questions:
1. How do you feel?
2. What do you notice?
3. What do you question?
4. How do you relate to the story?
After reading each short story/chapter, students were asked to complete their journal by answering these questions along with any other observations or comments. To assist the students (as well as to promote buy-in to the task) I also kept my own journal which was available to the students.
Here is an example of a student’s response:

All in all, I have found the use of guided journals to be both a rewarding and educational experience for my students. If anyone would like further information on this or the paper, please contact me.
Saturday, June 5, 2010
Links for Classes With Computers
National Geographic has some great pages for kids to do research:
Countries
Animals
Yahoo has a fun World Fact Book
British Council has a fun Make a Monster page - good for learning colors/body parts
The New 7 Wonders page is an interesting basis for a C.A.L.L. class
Students can do some reading online at Children's Storybooks Online
Check out my C.A.L.L. class website for a few other ideas...
Countries
Animals
Yahoo has a fun World Fact Book
British Council has a fun Make a Monster page - good for learning colors/body parts
The New 7 Wonders page is an interesting basis for a C.A.L.L. class
Students can do some reading online at Children's Storybooks Online
Check out my C.A.L.L. class website for a few other ideas...
Monday, May 24, 2010
Classroom Interaction
Been a while since I've posted but my MA has taken over things for a little while. I've been a lot on Interaction Hypothesis (Long, 1996) which has given be cause to really start to think about 'how' my learners interact and communicate in my classrooms.
Some of the major features of the Interaction Hypothesis are:
Negotiation of Meaning
Negative Feedback
Pushed output
Modified output
Basically, these features point towards our learners pushing themselves to provide the next level of output, whilst using feedback (from either other learners or the teacher) to modify that output, and in turn notice gaps in their existing knowledge. Such noticing will enable them to revise their existing hypotheses regarding language use.
A good overview of this, and how it applies to your classes, can be found here:
The Interaction Hypothesis: What it is and How it Naturally Occurs in the ESL Classroom
To work towards providing such an environment I decided to employ some of the "Spot the Difference" style tasks that I'd been reading about in the literature.
If you're not familiar, these work as follows:
1) Learners pair up
2) Each learner gets one picture from the "spot the difference" pair of pictures
3) Learners then have to use oral language to find the differences (WITHOUT SEEING EACH OTHERS' PICTURES!!!!)
I was very surprised at the amount of language this generated. I had otherwise quiet learners engaging in 20 minutes of solid English speaking. Not only that, it required them to engage in deeper-processing of what their partner was saying, as well as seeking clarification from them.
So, where can you find some of these?
A good source is Penny Ur's book Discussions that Work (1989). It's part of the excellent Cambridge Handbooks For Language Teachers series.
Or, you can simply Google "Spot the Difference" and use pictures that come up.
Would love to hear from some other teachers as to how they generate high-quality interaction amongst their learners or from anyone who has tried similar tasks.
Thanks
Some of the major features of the Interaction Hypothesis are:
Negotiation of Meaning
Negative Feedback
Pushed output
Modified output
Basically, these features point towards our learners pushing themselves to provide the next level of output, whilst using feedback (from either other learners or the teacher) to modify that output, and in turn notice gaps in their existing knowledge. Such noticing will enable them to revise their existing hypotheses regarding language use.
A good overview of this, and how it applies to your classes, can be found here:
The Interaction Hypothesis: What it is and How it Naturally Occurs in the ESL Classroom
To work towards providing such an environment I decided to employ some of the "Spot the Difference" style tasks that I'd been reading about in the literature.
If you're not familiar, these work as follows:
1) Learners pair up
2) Each learner gets one picture from the "spot the difference" pair of pictures
3) Learners then have to use oral language to find the differences (WITHOUT SEEING EACH OTHERS' PICTURES!!!!)
I was very surprised at the amount of language this generated. I had otherwise quiet learners engaging in 20 minutes of solid English speaking. Not only that, it required them to engage in deeper-processing of what their partner was saying, as well as seeking clarification from them.
So, where can you find some of these?
A good source is Penny Ur's book Discussions that Work (1989). It's part of the excellent Cambridge Handbooks For Language Teachers series.
Or, you can simply Google "Spot the Difference" and use pictures that come up.
Would love to hear from some other teachers as to how they generate high-quality interaction amongst their learners or from anyone who has tried similar tasks.
Thanks
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
NEWS NEWS NEWS!!!
Here are a few news activities for adult classes (high intermediate to advanced).
News Ranking Questionnaire
Discuss and rank news items
Focus - Practice expressing opinions / negotiate of choices
Functions of News
A discussion worksheet - why do we watch the news? Entertainment or information?
Focus - Expressing values - reported speech
News Ranking Questionnaire
Discuss and rank news items
Focus - Practice expressing opinions / negotiate of choices
Functions of News
A discussion worksheet - why do we watch the news? Entertainment or information?
Focus - Expressing values - reported speech
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
